Tire Flipping Regains Prominence as Exercise Modality.

Tuesday, May 24, 2005 22:25
Posted in category Media, Strength Training

Ever since I got my CSCS, I’ve been much more tolerant of so-called “functional training”. Being a HIT/SS guy, I have to admit that there is utility in functional/sports-specific training, but the vast majority of it remains, in my eyes, a complete waste of time (I’ll touch upon this some more in later posts, since nothing’s better than a HIT guy ranting about how functional training sucks). There is definitely a time and place (and population) for it, however - particularly if you are dealing with an individual who is particularly robust and/or supremely conditioned.

This morning I read an article in one of New York’s free papers, Metro, reviewing a gym typical of this ilk. “Back to the Basics - Rocky Style” on page 15 entails the various training methodology of Cutting Edge Sports Sciences, a gym in Albany, NY. The bolded quote says it all: “If you just want to look good, this isn’t for you. We’re talking about functional strength.”(emphasis added)

Hoo boy.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m a sucker for a good strongman competition. I personally really enjoy farmer’s walks, sandbag tossing and carrying, and I’ve even been known to bench with the odd chain or two. But I am armed with the knowledge that these activities are simply hard work, and that they do not magically impart special abilities (other than brute strength) that will add to my jiu-jitsu game. Nor will they make me more “explosive”, any more than more conventional methods of resistance training and sports-specific drills will. They are, simply put, a diversion from the norm - tools to combat the tedium that is incrementally improving my attributes a little at a time.

“We’re pretty anti-machine here,” says the proprietor, Dyke Naughton. No problem - I mean, they were only invented to make one’s life easier. After all, you don’t need to use a washing machine to do your laundry; it’ll get just as clean if you hand-wash, just like the Eastern Bloc athletes used to do. And you’ll get a great pair of forearms to boot.

At least I know who to call if I need the tires on my monster truck rotated.

All kidding aside, there’s no great secrets to athletic performance and great health: get as strong as possible and condition your body as closely as you can in preparation for your activity. After all, many roads lead to enlightenment. Some are just a little more windy and circuitous than others (although that can be great fun, too).

I’d provide a link but the Metro website is so abysmally slow I’m afraid you would kill yourself waiting for the pdf file to download.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Tire Flipping Regains Prominence as Exercise Modality.”

  1. Anonymous (28 comments) says:

    October 20th, 2005 at 5:44 pm

    What do you mean by HIT/SS? I am somewhat familiar with HIT (one set to failure on various machine exercises). Is your definition of HIT similar? If not, what is your definition of HIT? And what does the SS stand for? Super Slow?

  2. :E (28 comments) says:

    October 20th, 2005 at 11:26 pm

    HIT is an acronym for High Intensity Training. There are many incarnations of HIT, but the common threads are these:

    1.) Maximal intensity - all sets (aside from warm-ups) performed to momentary muscular failure.

    2.) Minimal volume - if there was HIT gospel, I suppose it’d be one set to failure. But different HIT advocates like Ken Leistner, Bob Whelan, Stuart McRobert, et.al, utilize and promote multiple set programs, which is just fine with me.

    3.) Short workouts and infrequent training - again, who’s right and who’s wrong? Is Mike Mentzer with his 15 minute workouts once every 3 weeks correct, or Matt Bryzcki doing two weekly 60 minute workouts? Both are considered HIT guys but their routines look dramatically different.

    As far as SS, it is short for SuperSlow. But I’m not a SuperSlow guy in the Ken Hutchins vein. I advocate a shorter TUL (time under load) so more weight can be used. I’m not too particular as far as equipment is concerned - I’d rather use a MedX Pullover with a perfect cam, but I don’t mind performing slow chin-ups with a plate strapped on. I even happen to like deadlifts and squats. It just so happens that I prefer lifting in a slow cadence.

    Hope this clears things up. Thanks for posting.

  3. Anonymous (28 comments) says:

    October 21st, 2005 at 1:01 pm

    Do you advocate HIT/SS for athletes?

  4. :E (28 comments) says:

    October 25th, 2005 at 10:48 pm

    In short, yes, I do. There are, of course, context-specific caveats to that. But if you are referring to their strength training, then the answer is yes.

    If you wish to discuss this issue more in-depth, feel free to email me. You can click on the “email” link under my profile.

    Thanks!

Leave a Reply


Comments links could be nofollow free.