DESIGNING BETTER LIVING THROUGH STRENGTH
Subscribe Above
EUGENIZATION
a personal training blog

Lessons From Tim Russert.

by Eugene Thong on June 19, 2008

First off, my sincere condolences to Mr. Russert’s family and friends.  May he rest in peace.

On to the lesson (warning: links to studies and media ahead):

Tim Russert’s recent passing is (to my eyes, anyway) another example of how doctors with the best intentions doing everything they’re “supposed to” do end up not being able to help a person avoid premature death.  In fact, by following medical orthodoxy but not directly applying what the research says, they may even have done Mr. Russert a grave disservice. 

Let’s look at some key points in Mr. Russert’s health profile:

Are you thinking what I’m thinking?  No?  Ok – I’ll put the pieces together for you.

Russert was insulin-resistant (Type 2 diabetic).  This put him at far greater risk for all cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke, etc.)  Russert was probably prescribed a cardio-protective diet, which translates to “low-fat.”  A low-fat diet (as Gary Taubes, Mike Eades and others have pointed out) is by definition a high-carb diet.  This constant consumption of carbs further exacerbates Russert’s already high insulin, which him at even greater risk

Worse still, the typical diet recommended for diabetics limits Russert’s intake of protein and fat, which will cause his HDL to decrease.  HDL levels are inversely associated with mortality from heart disease; the higher your HDL level, the less chance you have of dying from heart disease.

The high carbs also cause his triglyceride levels to increase.  High triglyceride levels are positively associated with mortality from heart disease; the higher your triglycerides, the greater chance you have of dying from heart disease.

Don’t even get me started on the statins.  Or his work stress

All in all, it didn’t look good for poor Tim. 

Mr. Russert’s doctors, acting in good faith, saw that he was at risk for a potential cardiac event and put him on a so-called cardio-protective program.  They gave him the best treatment and care possible within the guidelines of medical orthodoxy.  But what if medical orthodoxy is wrong?

What if eating a low-carb diet comprised mostly of real foods like meats, eggs, vegetables, some fruit, nuts, and seeds was the best way to promote health and avoid disease?

Just an opinion.

Add to Del.cio.us RSS Feed Add to Technorati Favorites Stumble It! Digg It!
    www.sajithmr.com

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

Janet (1 comments) June 20, 2008 at 1:57 am

Your lesson is more helpful. Thanks for sharing it.

Day Bierce (1 comments) June 21, 2008 at 8:40 am

Thank goodness I came across you, Dr Eades, Taubes and Hahn. The information from all of you has made a tremendous difference in my life. A difference all for the better. Keep up the excellent work.

mrfreddy (14 comments) June 25, 2008 at 5:01 pm

Dr. Davis, the heart scan blog guy, has a couple of excellent posts on poor Tim’s demise.

Based on his heart scan score in 1998, it was entirely predictable, that his heart would ’splode like it did. Sadly for him and his family, it was also completely avoidable.
http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/russert-protocol.html

http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/tim-russert-had-heart-scan.html

I wonder what George Carlin’s diet was like? I read a quote that he was following a strict diet to avoid heart disease, but I couldnt find any details on what he was eating. He’s probably another victim of the low fat mania.

Eugene Thong (49 comments) June 26, 2008 at 1:47 pm

Fritz,

Wow – had no idea his heart scan score would elevate so in 10 years. Predictable? More like inevitable.

As far as Carlin goes, I couldn’t find anything on his diet either but knowing he had three previous non-fatal heart attacks I can almost guarantee he was on a similar regimen.

Shame, really.

Christopher (14 comments) June 28, 2008 at 3:30 am

Another great post Eugene. Way to tie together the symptoms of “metabolic syndrome” in a way that illustrates how “medical orthodoxy” may not have been the best course of action. . .

Previous post: Pre and Post Workout Nutrition – A Hoax?

Next post: 300 Calories.