Armchair Football Coaches Watching the Combines.

Sunday, July 10, 2005 21:35
Posted in category Sports Performance

My cable provider recently added the NFL channel to our cable lineup, which is absolutely fantastic, since I never watch football games. But it proved to be a good thing this past weekend, during one of the requisite summer barbecues we are all supposed to have during the weekends.

The NFL channel was running coverage of the 2005 Combines, which, for those of you who don’t know, is the premier event in a potential NFL draft’s career. The combine allows select NFL Head Coaches & General Managers to sneak a peak at the upcoming college talent pool. The invitees go through various physical and mental challenges for the team officials as clubs evaluate them. In other words, scouts watch potentials run around a lot doing weird pattern drills for 4 days. Generally speaking, you do well in the combines, you get the nod.

Most of my friends are not in the fitness industry. Nor do they enjoy it when I engage in lengthy discussions of various minutiae regarding biomechanics, metabolism, etc. They are, in the purest sense of the word, laypersons. And yet these laypersons were able to (unexpectedly to me) point out perhaps the most glaring error in the entire combine.

“Why are they running 40s?”

You see, dear reader, if you were not previously informed, the 40 yard dash is probably regarded as the event in the combine, akin to what the 100m dash is to the Summer Olympics. When coaches say, “He’s fast,” the unspoken end of the sentence is “in the 40.” Much of combine prep is based around the 40, while it is but a small part of the criteria for judging the athlete’s performance (the others being Bench Press, Vertical Jump, Broad Jump, 20 Yard Shuttle, 3 Cone Drill, 60 Yard Shuttle, Position Specific Drills, NFL Team Interviews, Physical Measurements, The Wonderlic Test, The Cybex Test, Injury Evaluation, and a Urine test.)

But back to the point: They asked me why the players were being asked to run 40s. And I just smiled and shrugged my shoulders.

“I don’t know why either. Coaches seem to like 40 yard dashes an awful lot.”

My layperson friends realized what coaches and conditioning staff seem not to: that the chance a football player will actually run 40 yards in an actual game is extremely unlikely. And yet, it is been established as criteria for judging a player’s ability.

Well, it certainly makes for good viewing. I had a lot of fun ripping their starting and running technique. Speed camp, anyone?

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Armchair Football Coaches Watching the Combines.”

  1. Anonymous (28 comments) says:

    July 17th, 2005 at 2:31 pm

    In football 40s are obviously what they use test how fast and explosive a player might be. Why do they time the 40? It migh have something to do how much time the Quarterback has to throw the football. The average time a quarterback has to throw the football is 4-5 seconds. Plus, if your a wide-reciever it matters because you have to get open in a hurry!! Especially if the defense is blitzing the Quarterback.

    But the problem is that most plays aren’t designed to go 40yds. So how applicable is the 40 yds dash? I don’t know, but what I do know is most coaches don’t care about skill level as much as they care about speed (speed can’t be taught philosophy) mainly because with practice you can always improve an athletes skill level. For example, accomplished players like Jerry Rice, Cris Carter etc… were very successful WR’s in the NFL even though they ran very poor 40’s times at the combine. So the question still remains, why is the 40 yds. dash so important? Why not run 10yds, or 20 yds. sprints?

  2. :E (28 comments) says:

    July 17th, 2005 at 7:57 pm

    Right. That’s exactly my point. Why place so much emphasis on a skill (since 40s test running mechanics more than anything else) that will, for the most part, not apply to an actual game situation?

    40s are good for showing acceleration ability. One could even make a case for 40s being good for reaction time or top speed. But does a good 40 translate into actual game speed? And if not, why does everyone place so much of an emphasis on them?

    Thanks for the comment!

Leave a Reply


Comments links could be nofollow free.